Countly vs June
Both Countly and June are European-built, GDPR-compliant solutions in the web analytics space. This comparison breaks down their features, pricing, compliance posture, and data residency so you can make an informed choice for your team.
Quick Overview
Countly
EU- Headquarters
- London, GB
- Pricing
- Free
- Open Source
- Yes
June
EU- Headquarters
- Paris, FR
- Pricing
- Free
- Open Source
- No
Key Differences
- Countly offers a free tier, while june offers a free tier. The different pricing models mean you should evaluate which approach better fits your usage pattern.
- Countly is open source, meaning you can audit the code, self-host, and avoid vendor lock-in. June is proprietary, which often means a more polished out-of-the-box experience and dedicated support, but less flexibility for customisation.
- Countly holds ISO 27001 certification, providing third-party assurance of its security practices. June does not currently hold these certifications, which may matter if your organisation requires them for vendor approval.
- Countly was founded in 2013, giving it a 8-year head start over June (founded 2021). More time in market often means a larger user community and more mature integrations, though newer entrants may offer more modern architectures.
- Each product has unique strengths: Countly offers Product analytics and User segmentation, while June provides Auto-generated reports and Company-level analytics. Your choice depends on which capabilities matter most for your workflow.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Countly | June |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Countly | June |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Free Tier | ||
| GDPR | ||
| ISO 27001 | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Headquarters | London, GB | Paris, FR |
| Data Centers | EU | EU |
| Product analytics | ||
| User segmentation | ||
| Push notifications | ||
| Crash analytics | ||
| A/B testing | ||
| Retention analysis | ||
| Funnel analysis | ||
| Self-hosting option | ||
| GDPR tools | ||
| Auto-generated reports | ||
| Company-level analytics | ||
| Feature adoption tracking | ||
| Slack integration | ||
| CRM sync | ||
| AI insights |
Pricing Comparison
Countly
Freefree (community) / enterprise
June
Freefreemium
Compliance Comparison
Countly
GDPRISO 27001DPA
June
GDPRDPA
Get Started
Categories
How to Choose
You need code transparency or self-hosting
Choose Countly
You want a fully managed, turnkey solution
Choose June
Your procurement requires ISO 27001 certification
Choose Countly
You need enterprise-grade support and stability
Choose Countly
You prefer a nimble provider with personalised support
Choose June
Countly vs June — FAQ
What is the main difference between Countly and June?
Both Countly and June are European web analytics solutions with full GDPR compliance. The key differences lie in their approach: Countly is open source while June is proprietary, and Countly uses free (community) / enterprise pricing while June uses freemium. Countly is headquartered in London, GB, while June is based in Paris, France. Your choice should depend on your specific requirements for features, pricing, and data residency.
Which is more affordable, Countly or June?
Both Countly and June offer free tiers, so you can try either without cost. Pricing models differ (free (community) / enterprise vs. freemium), so compare based on your usage pattern rather than just the starting price.
Are both Countly and June GDPR compliant?
Yes. Both Countly and June are European companies that store data within the EU/EEA and offer Data Processing Agreements. Neither is subject to the US CLOUD Act or FISA surveillance. Additionally, Countly holds ISO 27001 certification. For GDPR purposes, either option eliminates the legal risks associated with using US-based services.