OpenProject vs Teamleader
Both OpenProject and Teamleader are European-built, GDPR-compliant solutions in the project management space. This comparison breaks down their features, pricing, compliance posture, and data residency so you can make an informed choice for your team.
Quick Overview
OpenProject
EU- Headquarters
- Berlin, DE
- Pricing
- Free
- Open Source
- Yes
Teamleader
EU- Headquarters
- Ghent, BE
- Pricing
- From €25/mo
- Open Source
- No
Key Differences
- OpenProject offers a free tier, while teamleader starts at €25/month. This makes OpenProject more accessible for individuals and small teams exploring their options before committing.
- OpenProject is open source, meaning you can audit the code, self-host, and avoid vendor lock-in. Teamleader is proprietary, which often means a more polished out-of-the-box experience and dedicated support, but less flexibility for customisation.
- Data residency differs: OpenProject hosts data in Germany, EU, while Teamleader hosts in Belgium, EU. If your organisation requires data to stay in a specific EU country, this distinction matters for compliance.
- Teamleader holds ISO 27001 certification, providing third-party assurance of its security practices. OpenProject does not currently hold these certifications, which may matter for enterprise procurement requirements.
- Each product has unique strengths: OpenProject offers Gantt charts and work packages and Agile boards (Scrum and Kanban), while Teamleader provides CRM and Project planning. Your choice depends on which capabilities matter most for your workflow.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | OpenProject | Teamleader |
|---|---|---|
| Name | OpenProject | Teamleader |
| Pricing | Free | From €25/mo |
| Free Tier | ||
| GDPR | ||
| ISO 27001 | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Headquarters | Berlin, DE | Ghent, BE |
| Data Centers | DE, EU | BE, EU |
| Gantt charts and work packages | ||
| Agile boards (Scrum and Kanban) | ||
| Time and cost tracking | ||
| Resource management | ||
| Document management | ||
| Built-in wiki | ||
| Meeting management | ||
| BIM support | ||
| REST API | ||
| Self-hosting option | ||
| CRM | ||
| Project planning | ||
| Time tracking | ||
| Invoicing | ||
| Deal pipelines | ||
| Contact management | ||
| Integrations | ||
| Reporting |
Pricing Comparison
OpenProject
Freefree / enterprise
Teamleader
From €25/mosubscription
Compliance Comparison
OpenProject
GDPRDPA
Teamleader
GDPRISO 27001DPA
Get Started
Categories
How to Choose
You need code transparency or self-hosting
Choose OpenProject
You want a fully managed, turnkey solution
Choose Teamleader
You're a startup or individual on a budget
Choose OpenProject
Your procurement requires ISO 27001 certification
Choose Teamleader
You need enterprise-grade support and stability
Choose OpenProject
You prefer a nimble provider with personalised support
Choose Teamleader
OpenProject vs Teamleader — FAQ
What is the main difference between OpenProject and Teamleader?
Both OpenProject and Teamleader are European project management solutions with full GDPR compliance. The key differences lie in their approach: OpenProject is open source while Teamleader is proprietary, and OpenProject uses free / enterprise pricing while Teamleader uses subscription. OpenProject is headquartered in Berlin, Germany, while Teamleader is based in Ghent, Belgium. Your choice should depend on your specific requirements for features, pricing, and data residency.
Which is more affordable, OpenProject or Teamleader?
OpenProject offers a free tier, while teamleader starts at €25/month. Pricing models differ (free / enterprise vs. subscription), so compare based on your usage pattern rather than just the starting price.
Are both OpenProject and Teamleader GDPR compliant?
Yes. Both OpenProject and Teamleader are European companies that store data within the EU/EEA and offer Data Processing Agreements. Neither is subject to the US CLOUD Act or FISA surveillance. Additionally, Teamleader holds ISO 27001 certification. For GDPR purposes, either option eliminates the legal risks associated with using US-based services.